Comparison between SFTs with window tail sizes 512 and 1024, with low- and high-pass filter and line suppression

Overview

I created SFTs for the same 1800-second segment using window sizes 512 and 1024.

The following lines were suppressed during run D:

The high-pass filter was set at order=15, f=200 Hz and a=0.5

The low-pass filter was set at order=15, f=1500 Hz and a=0.5

The power plots describe the difference between power computed from SFT coefficients. The SFT plots describe the distance between two coefficients as complex numbers.

Two flavors of plots are available for comparison:

The averaging was produced using the current and previous 63 bins. The reason it is not centered on the bin is because this was easier to implement with current code.

All plots are logarithmic.

Power

Entire file

Absolute
Relative

150 Hz - 1000 Hz

Absolute
Relative

650 Hz - 670 Hz

Absolute
Relative

200 Hz - 400 Hz

Absolute
Relative

240 Hz - 270 Hz

Absolute
Relative

250 Hz - 255 Hz

Absolute
Relative

251.25 Hz - 251.35 Hz

Absolute
Relative

263 Hz - 263.1 Hz

Absolute
Relative

SFT

Entire file

Absolute
Relative

150 Hz - 1000 Hz

Absolute
Relative

650 Hz - 670 Hz

Absolute
Relative

200 Hz - 400 Hz

Absolute
Relative

240 Hz - 270 Hz

Absolute
Relative

250 Hz - 255 Hz

Absolute
Relative

251.25 Hz - 251.35 Hz

Absolute
Relative

263 Hz - 263.1 Hz

Absolute
Relative

Power plot of SFT with window size 1024